When counterfeit fashion or electronics enter the market, consumers suffer financially. But when fake medical devices infiltrate hospitals and surgical rooms, lives are at risk.
That’s exactly what happened in the case of Johnson & Johnson vs. Medserve, where counterfeit surgical products bearing the trusted name of ‘SURGICEL’ and ‘ETHICON’ made their way into medical procedures.
What started as a routine surgery in the U.S. turned into a global hunt for a criminal counterfeiting operation spanning multiple countries—all leading back to a small medical supplier in New Delhi.
A Dangerous Discovery in the Operating Room
In 2019, a neurosurgeon at the University of Kentucky Medical Center noticed something off about a ‘SURGICEL’ surgical product during a critical brain surgery. What was supposed to be a sterile, absorbable hemostat felt unusual in texture.
Upon closer examination, the hospital realized that the product was counterfeit. The concern escalated when lab tests confirmed bacterial contamination and improper oxidation levels, making it unsafe for surgical use.
Johnson & Johnson immediately launched an international investigation. What they uncovered was a criminal web of counterfeit medical devices spanning the United States, UAE, and India.
Tracking the Counterfeit Trail: From the U.S. to India
The counterfeit SURGICEL product had been purchased from XS Supply, a U.S.-based supplier, which had sourced it from Lion Heart Surgical Supply, Florida. Lion Heart, in turn, had acquired these fakes from Pure Care Traders in the UAE.
When Johnson & Johnson raided Lion Heart’s offices, they found forged purchase orders and fake invoices. But the real shock came when employees at Lion Heart named their main supplier—M/s Medserve, a company based in New Delhi, India.
Investigations revealed that Medserve’s owner, Pritamdas Arora, had been manufacturing and exporting thousands of counterfeit medical devices under the brand names ‘SURGICEL’, ‘ETHICON’, and ‘LIGACLIP’.
Further raids on Medserve’s premises in Delhi revealed:
Despite clear evidence, the accused refused to appear in court, leading the Delhi High Court to issue non-bailable warrants against them.
The Verdict: Heavy Damages and a Message to Counterfeiters
The Delhi High Court, after multiple failed court appearances by the defendants, proceeded ex-parte and ruled decisively in favor of Johnson & Johnson.
The court not only issued a permanent injunction against Medserve but also imposed:
The court strongly condemned the defendants’ actions, stating that counterfeiting medical devices isn’t just a trade mark issue—it’s a threat to human lives.
Access judgement here: https://dhccaseinfo.nic.in/jsearch/judgement.php?path=dhc/ABL/judgement/11-03-2025/&name=ABL11032025SC5702019_161716.pdf
📖 For more insights, stay tuned to Mentblue News.
The Supreme Court’s May 13, 2025 judgment has fundamentally revised the process for designating Senior Advocates, moving away from a rigid points-based system and placing greater value on holistic qualities central to the legal profession.
In a highly unusual development, the Supreme Court has ordered liquidation of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. even after the resolution plan was approved, the amount paid, and implementation had commenced-an extraordinary outcome almost never witnessed under India’s insolvency regime. The Court’s decision to set aside JSW Steel’s resolution plan underscores that gross violations of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be cured by mere payment or partial ...
Let’s consider a startup working on prototypes that are both aesthetically crafted and functionally driven, with innovators eager to protect their creations. While copyright is often the go-to protection for creative works, a dilemma arises under Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act. This provision withdraws copyright from certain works once they are commercially reproduced, unless protected under the Designs Act. In Cryogas v. Inox, the Supreme Court attem...