The Supreme Court has issued a notice in ๐๐ข๐ต๐ฉ๐บ๐ข๐ฏ ๐๐ข๐ณ๐ข๐ท๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ท. ๐๐ฏ๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ช๐ข (๐.๐.(๐) ๐๐ฐ. 182/2025), highlighting the dire conditions of persons with disabilities (PwD) in Indian prisons and calling for the strict implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The petition underscores the systemic neglect of PwD inmates, who are denied basic accommodations such as wheelchair-friendly spaces, accessible toilets, and necessary medical care.
The court acknowledged that the lack of disability-friendly infrastructure in prisons not only violates the RPwD Act but also infringes upon fundamental rights, particularly for undertrial prisoners. "Prisons should not become punishment beyond the sentence," the plea argues, emphasizing that PwD inmates face disproportionate hardships.
With the next hearing scheduled for April 8, this case raises a crucial question: Should incarceration strip individuals of their dignity and basic rights, or should it reflect a justice system that upholds humane treatment for all?
๐๐ผ๐ถ๐ป mentblue ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐.
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ฝ : https://lnkd.in/g9gBHk9j
๐ง๐ฒ๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ : https://t.me/mentblue
The Supreme Courtโs May 13, 2025 judgment has fundamentally revised the process for designating Senior Advocates, moving away from a rigid points-based system and placing greater value on holistic qualities central to the legal profession.
In a highly unusual development, the Supreme Court has ordered liquidation of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. even after the resolution plan was approved, the amount paid, and implementation had commenced-an extraordinary outcome almost never witnessed under Indiaโs insolvency regime. The Courtโs decision to set aside JSW Steelโs resolution plan underscores that gross violations of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be cured by mere payment or partial ...
Letโs consider a startup working on prototypes that are both aesthetically crafted and functionally driven, with innovators eager to protect their creations. While copyright is often the go-to protection for creative works, a dilemma arises under Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act. This provision withdraws copyright from certain works once they are commercially reproduced, unless protected under the Designs Act. In Cryogas v. Inox, the Supreme Court attem...