๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐ฑ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐ผ๐ป-๐ก๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ฐ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ: ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป’๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ
The Supreme Court recently ruled that for a retention order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act to apply, it is not necessary for the person to be named as an accused. The decision emphasizes that as long as a complaint alleging an offense under Section 3 is pending before a court, the retention order on seized electronic items, documents, and cash remains in effect.
The ruling, delivered in a case where the order was passed on April 4, 2018, clarifies that the continuation of such orders is linked to the progress of proceedings rather than the specific naming of the accused. This decision overturns previous interpretations and reinforces the authority of investigative agencies to retain seized assets until the final disposal of the complaint.
๐๐ผ๐ถ๐ป mentblue ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐.
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ฝ : https://lnkd.in/g9gBHk9j
๐ง๐ฒ๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ : https://t.me/mentblue
In a highly unusual development, the Supreme Court has ordered liquidation of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. even after the resolution plan was approved, the amount paid, and implementation had commenced-an extraordinary outcome almost never witnessed under Indiaโs insolvency regime. The Courtโs decision to set aside JSW Steelโs resolution plan underscores that gross violations of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be cured by mere payment or partial ...
Letโs consider a startup working on prototypes that are both aesthetically crafted and functionally driven, with innovators eager to protect their creations. While copyright is often the go-to protection for creative works, a dilemma arises under Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act. This provision withdraws copyright from certain works once they are commercially reproduced, unless protected under the Designs Act. In Cryogas v. Inox, the Supreme Court attem...
The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting issued an advisory to the Online Curated Content Publishers (โOTT platformsโ) and Self-regulatory Bodies of OTT platforms on 19thFebruary 2025. It aimed to reiterate the Code of Ethics for these OTT platforms in light of the increased spread of obscene content on online platforms. This emerges amid the debate of imbalance between censorship and artistic freedom in online content against the government.